LAYOUT OF INTERNET QUESTIONNAIRES

 

Many of the guidelines for layout of paper questionnaires apply to Internet questionnaires.

 

Graphical User Interface (GUI) software allows the researcher to control the background, colors, fonts, and other visual features displayed on the computer screen. It allows respondents to click on what they want rather than having to type answers or codes.

Web publishing software, such as WebSurveyor, FrontPage or Netscape Composer, is used to format the questionnaire.  Advantages: eassier, faster, friendlier, and more functionality beyond word processors.  Many can publish surveys to the Internet and retrieve responses automatically into their own data analysis programs and export raw data to other software packages such as SPSS for statistical analysis.  However, several features of a respondent’s computer may influence the appearance of an Internet questionnaire. For example, a respondent’s for screen configuration might result in questions that are not fully visible on the respondent’s screen, misaligned text, etc.

Layout Issues

1. Will the questionnaire will appear page-by-page, showing individual questions on single screens (web pages), or on a single, continuously-scrolling scrolling basis with the entire questionnaire appearing on a one screen (web page).   Most surveys use continuous scrolling.

     Page-by-page greatly facilitates skip patterns based on filter questions.  However, if users need to refer to previous question on a prior page they are unable to do so. 

     The scrolling layout gives the respondent the ability to scroll down to read any portion of the questionnaire at any time.  However, avoiding the problems associated with splitting questions and response categories may be difficult.  Also, users don’t usually like to scroll.  When a scrolling questionnaire is long, using multiple category or section headings is helpful.  Provide appropriate links to allow users to go to the top and bottom parts of each section, enabling the respondent to navigate through the questionnaire more easily than having to scroll through the entire document.

2. Whether a page-by-page or scrolling format is utilized, push buttons with labels should clearly describe the actions to be taken. (For example, if the respondent needs to go to the next page a large arrow labeled “NEXT” might appear in color at the bottom of a screen.)

3. Regarding the use of color, graphics, animation, sound, etc., a problem is that many respondents’ computers are not powerful enough to have complex features delivered at a satisfactory speed, if at all. For example, using a textured background, colored headings, and small graphics can make a questionnaire becomes more interesting and appealing, but they may present problems for respondents with older computers and/or low bandwidth Internet connections.

4. Use a status bar as a visual indicator of what portion of the survey the respondent has completed and hence of questionnaire length. This increases the likelihood that the respondent will finish the entire sequence of questions.

5. Use radio buttons for fixed alternative questions.  These are like push buttons on automobile radios; clicking on an alternative response deactivates the first choice and replaces it with the new response.  They are clearer and easier for respondents than drop-down boxes.

6. Use drop-down boxes, as space saving devices to provide a list of responses that are hidden from view. Initially a general statement, perhaps “please select” or “click here” is shown. Clicking on a down-facing arrow makes the full range of choices appear.  (If the first choice in a list, such as “strongly agree”, is shown with other responses hidden, the researcher is increasing his or her chances that response bias will occur)  Drop-down boxes may present a problem for individuals with minimal computer skills (compared to radio buttons), but they shorten the length of the viewable survey. 

7. Checklist questions may be placed in a check box – a smallb box next to an answer that a erspondent clicks on to choose that answer; tyically, a check mark or “X” appears in the clicked box. 

8. Open-ended boxes require respondents type enter text for open-ended questions. Open-ended boxes may be designed as One line Text Boxes or Scrolling Text Boxes depending on the breadth of the expected answer..

9. Pop-up boxes are message boxes that can be used to provide highlighted information or insrtuctions. For example, pop-up boxes may be use to provide a privacy statement.

10. Interactive layouts can be designed.  Internet software allows questioning to branch off into two or more different lines depending on each respondent’s answer to skip or filtered questions Most of these programs have hidden skip logic so respondents never see any evidence of skips.

Software can systematically or randomly manipulated the question a respondent see. Variable piping software allows variables, such as answers from previous questions, to be inserted into unfolding questions. Other software can randomly rotate questions, blocks of questions, and response alternative order from respondent to respondent.

Error trapping software can be used to control the questionnaire flow.  Respondents can be blocked from backing up, or can be allowed to stop mid-questionnaire and come back later to finish. If the respondent fails to answer a question, or answers it with an incorrect type of response, an immediate error message appears.

With forced answering software, respondents cannot skip questions --the program will not let them continue if they fail to answer a question.   The software may insert a bold-faced error message on the question screen or insert a pop-up box instructing the respondent how to continue.

 

Some research suppliers offer interactive help desks to solve problems that might be encounter in completing a questionnaire.