Business Administration Department

 

BA342 Consumer Behavior

Dr. Geoffrey Lantos                                                                                                      Spring 2008

 

PERIODICAL ARTICLE REVIEW

 

OVERVIEW

 

 

For students choosing to do two short written papers this semester, in lieu of one of the two written textbook experiential applications exercises you may instead find, read, summarize and critically analyze a periodical article on some aspect of consumer behavior.  In the standard grading plan, this completed assignment will constitute from 6 to 12% of your grade, depending on your individualized weights.  The due date will be that assigned to your group for the written textbook experiential applications exercise that you elect not to do. 

 

OBJECTIVES

 

The purposes of this assignment are that you:

·Become familiar with consumer behavior literature that is either academic/scholarly or practical/applied/trade (real world), since after graduation it is important to know where current information can be found.

·Develop your written communication skills and ability to think and write critically and clearly.

·Be exposed to viewpoints of and information from sources other than those of the professor and textbook authors.

 

PROCEDURE

 

First, find a recent (last 2 years) article that interests you.

 

You may choose an article from the academic marketing literature, i.e., from a professional "scholarly" journal authored primarily by university professors.  This includes:

Advances in Consumer Research                             Journal of Experimental Psychology

Advertising and Consumer Psychology                    Journal of International Consumer Marketing

Association of Consumer Research Proceedings     Journal of Macromarketing

Family and Consumer Sciences Journal                  Journal of Marketing

Harvard Business Review                                        Journal of Marketing Research

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science        Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Journal of Advertising                                                 Journal of Public Policy and Marketing

Journal of Advertising Research                             Journal of Product Innovation Management

Journal of Applied Psychology                                Journal of Personal Selling and Sales

Journal of Business Strategy                                           Management

Journal of Communication                                      Journal of Professional Services Marketing

Journal of Communication Research                           Journal of Research for Consumers

Journal of Consumer Affairs                                   Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services

Journal of Consumer Behaviour                              Journal of Services Marketing

Journal of Consumer Policy                                    Journal of Services Research

Journal of Consumer Marketing                             Journal of Social Psychology

Journal of Consumer Psychology                            Journalism Quarterly

Journal of Consumer Market Research                   Psychology and Marketing

Journal of Consumer Research                               Psychometrika

Journal of Consumer Satisfaction,                          Psychological Review

Dissatisfaction, and Complaining Behavior             Public Opinion Quarterly

                                                                                Review of Marketing Research

 

I advise that you avoid highly quantitative and/or difficult-to-read articles.

 

Alternatively, you may select an article from the applied marketing literature, i.e., from a trade or practitioner publication authored by "real-world" practitioners.  This literature includes:

Advertising Age                                                       Product Marketing

Adweek                                                                    Management Review

American Demographics                                          Marketing Communications

Brandweek                                                              Marketing and Media Decisions

Direct Marketing                                                     Marketing Research: A Magazine of Management

Inc.                                                                           and Application

Marketing News                                                      Sales and Marketing Management

                                                                                Stores. 

Such literature also includes any other commercial/business magazines or newspapers containing a substantive in-depth (several pages) article on consumer behavior.  These publications include:

Barron's                                                                   Industry Week

Business Horizons                                                       Marketing and Media Decisions

Business Week                                                         Nation's Business

Business Month                                                       Psychology Today

Forbes                                                                     The Wall Street Journal

Fortune                                                                    USA Today

 You should look for a relatively substantive, in-depth article; for example, a feature article in Fortune or Business Week, a front-page story in column 1 or 4 on page 1 of the Wall Street Journal, or a “cover story” from USA Today..

 

Second, read the article and take notes on and/or highlight its major points and ideas.  The purpose of note taking is to help you identify, organize, and recall important information, ideas, and details.  This means that you must be able to recognize, in context: dates, names, and places; important or unusual details; key words and phrases; definitions; and examples.  Do not get bogged down in minutia, e.g., statistical calculations, methodological issues, etc.  Your notes and/or highlights will serve as the basis for your written summary of the article.  A summary is a brief statement of the article's main points (items 2 and 3 below).  It omits long descriptions and detailed examples.

 

Third, digest this material.  Read over your summary notes and think about the article critically, jotting down your own ideas.  This will form the basis for your analysis of the article (items 4, 5, and 6 below).  An analysis or critique describes what is right as well as what is wrong with something, and it can offer suggestions for improvement.

 

The summary and analysis of your article should discuss each of the following six areas: (Pick and choose within each area, depending on available information).

 

1.       Who is the author(s)?  What are his or her qualifications for writing on this topic?  How credible is the writer?

          * Education

          * Scholarly achievements

          * Business or administrative experience

* Other published work

* Viewpoint/perspective (e.g., pro-business vs. pro-consumer, conservative vs. liberal, religious vs. secular, etc.)

            Note: Background information can be found in Who's Who, The New York Times Biographical

            Index, Contemporary Authors, or other biographical references, on university/corporate Web

            pages, or by typing the author’s name in a search engine.

 

2.       What is the author's message?

          * Major theme (in one sentence, if possible)

          * Purpose of the message/author's motives for writing  

          * The major issues raised or questions addressed

          * What the author wants the audience to do, think about, or believe.  What are the

          article's objectives?

          * Does the author identify and clearly explain key concepts or ideas we need to understand in order to understand the writer’s line of reasoning?

          * What factors might have influenced the author's viewpoint based on his or her background?

          * Conclusions drawn by the author: Do they logically follow from the evidence and assumptions?  Do you agree or disagree with the author’s conclusions?

          * What other conclusions, if any, could be drawn from the same information?

          * What are the implications and consequences that follow from the author’s conclusion?  How were these reached? 

 

3.       What evidence is offered to support the author's message?

          * What is the most important information in the article?  Cite three or four key points, examples, anecdotes, references, facts, quotes, experiences, data, or aspects of a research study that support the theme.  (Consider, where relevant, possible faults in research methodology; qualifications of the people the author quotes; and prior research studies or articles cited.)

          * Is the article balanced, i.e., is information presented that opposes the author’s viewpoint as well as information that supports it? 

* Is the evidence clear, accurate, and relevant to the question at issue?

* Is there sufficient evidence?

 

4.       How well is the argument presented?

* Is the article clearly organized and easy to follow (e.g., logical flow, sections tied together, use of exhibits, etc.)

* Is the article clearly written?  Explain.

          * Is the article interesting?  Why or why not?

          * Does the author have a particular point of view/perspective that is shaping his or her argument?  If so, describe this perspective.  Is there another viewpoint that should be considered?

          * Explain how well the argument incorporates the following critical thinking/intellectual standards:

·  Clarity: Is further elaboration/explanation needed?  Are examples or illustrations needed?  (E.g., “Something should be done to improve direct marketing efforts” is very vague.)

·  Accuracy/truthfulness: Does the author present true information?  Does the writer verify statements?  (E.g., “Most consumers are over 200 pounds in weight” is incorrect.)

·  Precision: Is the author specific, providing sufficient details?  (E.g., “The typical American consumer is overweight” doesn’t tell by how much.)

·  Relevance: Is everything connected to the article’s theme? (E.g., how well a company is performing shouldn’t be measured by the efforts of its employees since performance is an output, not an input, measure.)

·  Depth: Does the argument address the complexities of the issue? (E.g., “Just say no” is a superficial answer to dealing with our nation’s drug problem.)

·  Breadth: Do we need to consider another viewpoint or perspective besides the author’s?  Does the article only recognize the insights of one viewpoint on a debatable issue?  Does it consider and respond to objections framed from other relevant viewpoints? 

·  Logical consistency/logical fallacies/faulty reasoning (vs. compelling arguments).  When the thoughts are mutually supporting and make sense in combination, the thinking is logical (not contradictory).  Does the evidence support the author’s claims? 

          * Limitations and/or assumptions that might need to be tested  What is the author taking for granted that might be questionable (this is often unstated)?

          * Facts vs. opinions—are opinions or preferences presented as though they are facts?

          * Use of propaganda techniques to influence opinions and to avoid the truth (often by omitting significant information or distorting it). 

          * Are the article's objectives clear and are they successfully met?

* What is your opinion—do you agree or disagree with the author(s)?

 

5.       How does this article relate to other work, things you know, or things you can discover in this area of marketing?  These can include other authorities (compare and contrast with other articles, books, etc.), personal experience of yourself or others you know, concepts learned in BA342 or in other marketing and/or business/college courses, etc.  Does the article add something new to our existing knowledge?

 

6.       What is the significance of this article for marketing management?

          * Is the topic timely and important?  For whom?

           * What consequences are likely to follow if people take the author’s line of reasoning seriously?

        * Usefulness of the author's ideas, findings (facts discovered), conclusions (inferences from the

         findings), and recommendations (actions suggested from the conclusions).  For example, what are the major implications for target marketing and positioning and for decisions on the “4 P’s,” public policy, or consumer decision making?  Are there any take-aways for consumers to use?  (These can be both ideas stated as well as unstated by the author.) 

          * Does the article contribute to our knowledge of consumer behavior? 

          * Did the author neglect anything important?  What other information might be necessary to know

             before making any judgment on the value and importance of this article?

 

FORMAT OF PAPERS

 

Each report is to be approximately four to five pages of typewritten, double-spaced pages of 10-to-12-point font size text, plus any exhibits that you might wish to add.  Include a title page with the name of the article, name of the periodical in which you found that article, the date of publication, your student number, the course name and number plus your section letter, the professor's name, and due date.  Please attach a photocopy of your article to your paper.  Cite any sources of information consulted in addition to the article itself (especially those related to item 5 above).  Follow all other format procedures noted on the syllabus and on the Experiential Applications Exercises Assignment handout.

 

Evaluation of Papers

 

Your papers will be evaluated on the following criteria:

                                                                                                                                                         Relative

                                                                                                                                                         Criterion            Importance

 

1.       Content – Quality and thoroughness of your summary of the article’s major points and ideas (highly informative/sufficiently detailed).  Creativity, originality, and logic of your analysis of the article.  This should include application of material learned in BA 342 or in other marketing, business, and non-business courses, and can include outside sources.                                                                                                     70%

2.   Organization, Presentation, and Appearance - Organization includes: a) coherence -- the paper is sequentially logical; paragraphs and sentences are in the right order; topics are developed within paragraphs; topic transitions between sections, paragraphs, and sentences flow smoothly and logically; b) unity -- introduction and conclusion (summarizes and provides closure); the theme is clear; everything in the paper defends or explains the theme.

Presentation and appearance involve matters such as neatness and proper formal paper format (including title page, endnotes, headings and subheadings, page numbers, margins, and use of exhibits and illustrative charts).

                                                                                                                                                       

                                                                                                                                                       15%

3.   Clarity of Communication - a) Writing style - the paper is clearly and concisely written, not to impress, but to make the reader understand; active voice; verb tense consistent; professional tone (absence of contractions, appropriate vocabulary, etc.); interesting style  b) Mechanics - grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation, word divisions (typographical errors, if present, should be corrected in pencil).

                                                                                                                                                       15%

                                                                                                                                                     100%

 

DUE DATE:

 

Your paper is due on the date either your first or second written experiential exercise is due (whichever one you choose not to do).